Because the GHG intensities are so high (best expressed in Mt/kt), if the user selects Mt per Mt, the solution scale is mistakenly rounded to “0”. Would it be hard to add a contingency where is the Unit Impact is >5000 in t/t, more sig figs are shown? Or some other way of handling this more extreme case w/o misleading 0s.

Please authenticate to join the conversation.
In Review
🐛 Bug Reports
3 months ago

aurora.ginzburg
Get notified by email when there are changes.
In Review
🐛 Bug Reports
3 months ago

aurora.ginzburg
Get notified by email when there are changes.