Skip to main content

Bad rounding for high GWP model

Because the GHG intensities are so high (best expressed in Mt/kt), if the user selects Mt per Mt, the solution scale is mistakenly rounded to “0”. Would it be hard to add a contingency where is the Unit Impact is >5000 in t/t, more sig figs are shown? Or some other way of handling this more extreme case w/o misleading 0s.

https://app.koi.eco/forecast/910114/1-0?baselineId=89401&solutionId=89402&marketSizeId=12945&marketCaptureId=8405&numUnitId=1351&denUnitId=1351&tab=ui

1 comment

Log in to comment and vote

Comments1

  • AmberGold

    Team•

    Oct 30, 2025

    Another example of bad rounding: Tokamak-Based Magnetic Confinement Fusion Energy System